Search

Biden Addresses Racial Justice, Saying Trump Adds ‘Fuel to the Fire’ - The New York Times

alemonarki.blogspot.com

This briefing has ended. Follow our latest coverage of the 2020 Election.

Video player loading
Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. delivered his vision to combat racial inequities in the economy during a speech on Tuesday in Wilmington, Del.CreditCredit...Michelle V. Agins/The New York Times

WILMINGTON, Del. — Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. on Tuesday unveiled the capstone to his sweeping economic recovery plan with a speech that outlined his vision to advance racial equity in the American economy.

Nodding to the fact that he was giving remarks soon after the death of the civil rights icon John Lewis, the congressman from Georgia, Mr. Biden warned that President Trump was “horrifyingly and not surprisingly, intentionally stoking the flames of division and racism in this country.”

The afternoon speech, delivered in Wilmington, Del., offered Mr. Biden a chance to detail a clear message on racial justice, and to cut another sharp contrast with his opponent, who has repeatedly taken incendiary actions on that issue at a moment of national crisis over racism and police violence.

“Every instinct Trump has is to add fuel to the fire,” the former vice president said. “It’s the last thing, the last thing we need. We need leadership that will calm the waters and lower the temperature.”

Speaking before four American flags in a community center gym, Mr. Biden framed fighting systemic racism as integral to a range of his economic proposals, from housing to infrastructure to supporting small businesses, a goal that he said goes well beyond the aim of defeating the president whose leadership, he said, has made everything worse.

“It’s about rising to this moment of crisis,” he said. “Understanding people’s struggles. And building a future worthy of their courage and their ambition to overcome.”

In recent months, Mr. Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, has increasingly called for ambitious measures to address the nation’s public health and economic challenges, and the growing outcry over racial injustice. His proposals go far beyond the instincts toward relatively incremental change that guided him in the primary, at least compared to many of his Democratic opponents.

Ahead of the speech, the Biden campaign released a policy plan on racial equity. It includes proposals for increasing access to venture capital and low-interest loans for small business owners of color and, on criminal justice, funding to improve how states seal criminal records for certain nonviolent offenders.

A number of the policies highlighted in his speech had already been announced as part of other initiatives, like a tax credit of up to $15,000 for first-time home buyers, or a goal that disadvantaged communities receive 40 percent of the benefits of spending on clean energy. The Tuesday event was part of a broader effort that aims to emphasize the idea that racial justice is core to Mr. Biden’s overall policy vision.

At the conclusion of his remarks, Mr. Biden took several wide-ranging questions from the news media on issues including the timing of his vice-presidential candidate pick (the first week of August, he said) and the baseball season, as he repeated much of the criticism of Mr. Trump that he has delivered in recent weeks.

Credit...Mike Desmond/WBFO, via Associated Press

Violent scenes from the recent national protests have been commonplace in political ads this year, as campaigns and outside groups have seized on the civil unrest as a political issue in a contentious election.

But a recent digital ad with more explicit imagery, including video clips of law enforcement officers beating protesters with batons, a New York police vehicle driving through a crowd and an older protester from Buffalo lying on the ground with blood coming out of his head, was rejected by Google under a policy that bans “shocking content.”

The ad, which was from Priorities USA, a Democratic super PAC, and Color of Change, a leading civil rights group, was set to start running on the platform on August 1 as part of a broader, $3.4 million campaign to target Black voters in Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

The ad was also rejected by Hulu and Verizon, while Facebook and Vevo are allowing the ad to run.

But the decision by Google, one of the largest platforms in the world, to reject the ad was the latest confrontation between technology companies and political campaigns over messaging, content and advertising heading into the 2020 election. With misinformation surrounding voting rights, the coronavirus pandemic and civil unrest seeping into the election, companies such as Google, Twitter and Facebook have often struggled to find a balance between stopping the flow of misinformation and allowing unfettered political discourse.

The decision also comes on the eve of a congressional hearing on Wednesday where the chief executives of Google, Facebook, Amazon and Apple will appear before Congress to argue that their companies do not stifle competition.

Priorities USA argued that there was a double standard being applied, as recent ads from the Trump campaign have also included violent images of the protests, and that the scenes depicted in the ad were core to the Trump administration’s policies.

“Anti-violence content policies were clearly put in place for good reasons, but we don’t live in reasonable times,” said Jenn Stowe, the deputy executive director of Priorities USA. “With Trump continuing to stoke violence across the country as a political tactic, ad vendors must re-evaluate their policies to ensure the issues facing voters in this election are not being censored by their out-of-date policies.”

Officials at Google pointed to specific scenes in the ad that showed physical abuse and blood as clear violations of their policies. While the Trump ads included footage of violence from the protests, they were either faraway shots of burning buildings, or appeared only briefly. The ad from Priorities USA showed more violent interactions, the officials said.

“We don’t allow advertisers to run ads that contain graphic violence, including depictions of blood, baton beatings and other instances of physical trauma,” the company said in a statement. “We recognize that this imagery is from current events, but we have a firm policy against ads with shocking and disturbing content.”

After Mr. Biden delivered a speech on racial equity and economic recovery Tuesday, he told reporters that he would choose his running mate in the first week of August.

“I’m going to have a choice in the first week in August, and I promise I’ll let you know when I do,” he said.

Mr. Biden had previously set a rough deadline of Aug. 1, this Saturday.

Asked if he would be able to meet with his running mate face-to-face because of safety concerns amid a pandemic, he said: “Well, we’ll see.” He later said that he has not yet been tested for the virus.

Mr. Biden’s search committee has completed thorough vetting reports on several candidates, and he has said he planned to personally interview all of the most serious contenders. Former Senator Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut and a friend of Mr. Biden’s who campaigned with him this year, was tapped to lead the search.

There is no guarantee that Mr. Biden will stick to his early-August timetable, and few Democrats are pushing him to rush a vice-presidential announcement while the current state of the presidential race is so favorable to him.

Mr. Biden has committed to choosing a woman as his running mate. A few of his former primary opponents have been widely recognized as formidable candidates, like Senators Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Kamala Harris of California. Others have emerged in the public eye as serious contenders, like Senator Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, Representative Karen Bass of California and Susan Rice, the former national security adviser.

Mr. Biden spoke with Ms. Bass on Monday when the two crossed paths at the Capitol after paying their respects to the congressman and civil rights icon John Lewis.

Credit...Doug Mills/The New York Times

During a briefing with reporters at the White House on Tuesday, President Trump again contradicted his own government’s communications on hydroxychloroquine, a malaria drug he has touted as a potential cure for the coronavirus, and suggested that opinions on the medication had become too politicized.

“Some people think it’s become political,” Mr. Trump said. “I think it works in the early stages. I think frontline medical people believe that too. Some. Many. So we’ll take a look at it.”

The Food and Drug Administration revoked its emergency approval of the drug last month, warning of risks like serious heart rhythm problems and kidney injury. Mr. Trump also defended sharing a widely debunked video of a woman claiming that masks could not stop the virus from spreading and that hydroxychloroquine was an effective treatment.

“I thought her voice was an important voice but I know nothing about her,” Mr. Trump said of the woman in the video, which was removed by Facebook, Twitter and YouTube for containing misleading information.

During the briefing, Mr. Trump did not veer away from the virus, a departure from past appearances where he has waxed about his political enemies at length. He did speak about Kodak and other American companies involved in producing goods connected to fighting the virus, and touted his use of the Defense Production Act, which provides the president with greater powers to compel businesses to produce needed supplies. Both hit on the theme of American manufacturing, a message central to his re-election bid.

Mr. Trump’s appearance came just after Mr. Biden, his presumptive Democratic opponent, targeted the president’s divisive behavior on race and policing issues.

“Every instinct Trump has is to add fuel to the fire,” Mr. Biden said. “It’s the last thing, the last thing we need. We need leadership that will calm the waters and lower the temperature.”

But Mr. Trump did mention one other polling rival: Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert. From the presidential podium, Mr. Trump wondered aloud why his approval ratings did not seem to be as high as Dr. Fauci’s.

“A man works for us, with us, very closely, Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx,” Mr. Trump said, referencing Deborah Birx, the administration’s coronavirus response coordinator. “Very highly thought of and they’re highly thought of, but nobody likes me. It can only be my personality.”

Credit...Alyssa Schukar for The New York Times

Senator Susan Collins of Maine, the lone New England Republican and a top target for Democrats seeking to capture the Senate majority, is trailing her Democratic opponent, Sara Gideon, by five percentage points, according to a new poll of likely voters in the state.

“The overwhelming takeaway is that voters are angry,” said Daniel M. Shea, a government professor at Colby College, which conducted the poll. Voters think Ms. Collins “is too close to Donald Trump and that she has forgotten about Maine,” he added.

Ms. Gideon, the speaker of Maine’s House of Representatives, who has raised an enormous war chest, had the support of 44 percent of likely voters in the poll, and Ms. Collins had 39 percent. The poll’s margin of sampling error was about four percentage points.

Ms. Collins, whose cultivated reputation as a moderate has suffered during the Trump administration, faces particular challenges with younger voters and women, the poll found. She had an approval rating of just 24 percent among voters under the age of 35 and 39 percent among women.

Ms. Collins’s decision to support Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court and to vote against Mr. Trump’s impeachment has led many voters to question her willingness to break with the Republican Party.

But Mr. Shea cautioned that the results of the poll were by no means a guarantee that Ms. Collins, who is facing the toughest election of her political career, will be defeated, calling the race “a nail-biter.”

“There’s a long way to go, and the senator is a strong campaigner and she has done a lot for the state,” he said. “So this is going to be a tight race to the end.”

Credit...Anna Moneymaker for The New York Times

Mr. Trump will visit Charlotte, N.C., to accept his nomination after all.

Mr. Trump said on Monday that he planned to visit the original host city of the Republican National Convention on Aug. 24, the start of the week that he once hoped would include large, celebratory events. He plans to pay a visit to the 336 delegates who will convene there for a day of convention business and the official roll call where the president is renominated.

The president’s pop-by in Charlotte is expected to be a low-key affair where he won’t deliver extended remarks of his own, in contrast to his official renomination speech, scheduled for Aug. 27. At a news conference on Tuesday, Mr. Trump declined to say where he would deliver that address, but said his team would be “announcing it very soon.”

Those plans have been in flux since last week, when Mr. Trump announced he was canceling the convention in Jacksonville, Fla., because of uncertainty created by the surging pandemic.

Also on Tuesday, Mayor Lenny Curry of Jacksonville held his first news conference since last week’s decision to call off the festivities, telling reporters that he believed it was the right call, even as Florida’s coronavirus numbers appear to be leveling off.

“The plateau could be a long ride,” Mr. Curry said.

Charlotte is the city where Mr. Trump decided he did not want to hold his convention, because of a disagreement with the Democratic governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, over social distancing rules.

“I’ll be in North Carolina, and that’s a very big deal because we have a lot of the delegates there and that’ll be a nomination process,” Trump told WRAL, a Raleigh, N.C., television station, while visiting Morrisville, N.C., on Monday. He traveled to the state to talk about the progress being made on a vaccine for the coronavirus. “That’s essentially where the nomination, where it’s formalized. And I’m really honored to do it in North Carolina.”

Credit...Anna Moneymaker for The New York Times

Attorney General William P. Barr is testifying on Capitol Hill on Tuesday for the first time in more than a year, defending the federal response to nationwide protests before the House Judiciary Committee.

Mr. Barr has also sowed doubts about the use of mail-in ballots in the November election, echoing the dozens of baseless claims Mr. Trump has made on the same topic. At the hearing, he continued that unfounded line of criticism.

“If you have wholesale mail-in voting, it substantially increases the risk of fraud,” Mr. Barr said in a response to questions from Representative Cedric Richmond of Louisiana, a Democrat and former chair of the Congressional Black Caucus who is a co-chairman of the Biden campaign.

The president has repeatedly claimed that mail-in ballots lead to fraud, a statement that has no basis in the experience of the states that give voters the option of voting by mail.

Mr. Barr said that while he has voted by mail before, his concerns about fraud had more to do with the widespread use of mail-in ballots.

“I’m not talking about accommodations to people who have to be out of the state or have some particular need not to, or inability to go and vote,” he said. “What I’m talking about is the wholesale conversion of elections to mail-in voting.”

Mr. Richmond noted that African-Americans are being harmed by the coronavirus at higher rates. “Not that it would be the first time that African-Americans would risk their lives to vote in this country to preserve its democracy,” he said.

Mr. Barr also defended the Trump administration’s use of federal agents to respond to demonstrations against racism and police brutality, forcefully asserting that they were fighting violent crime.

City officials have accused federal agents of using heavy-handed tactics and have said their presence reinvigorated tensions that had been subsiding.

Democratic lawmakers on the committee also asked Mr. Barr about his approach to the Mueller investigation, his recommendation of a shorter prison sentence for Roger J. Stone Jr. and other issues.

Mr. Trump’s campaign has routed nearly $170 million in spending through various firms headed or created by its former campaign manager, Brad Parscale, and other campaign officials, and a campaign watchdog said in a formal complaint on Tuesday that the payments were a “laundering” effort to hide the ultimate destination of the funds.

The accusation, made by the Campaign Legal Center to the Federal Election Commission, said that by using the Parscale-linked firm American Made Media Consultants, the Trump campaign has kept hidden the names of some vendors and advisers being paid by the campaign, including the president’s daughter-in-law Lara Trump and Kimberly Guilfoyle, the girlfriend of Donald Trump Jr.

The complaint cites several companies that do business with the Trump campaign and its shared committees with the Republican National Committee, which do not appear on F.E.C. disclosures.

For instance, Federal Communications Commission records show that the media-buying firm Harris Sikes Media has executed some of Mr. Trump’s ad purchases, but the campaign has reported no payments to that firm in 2019 and 2020, the complaint says.

Tim Murtaugh, a spokesman for Mr. Trump’s campaign, said that A.M.M.C. “builds efficiencies and saves the campaign money by providing these in-house services that otherwise would be done by outside vendors.” He said that the firm “does not earn any commissions or fees” and that the campaign “complies with all campaign finance laws and FEC regulations.”

Vice News was first to report on the complaint.

Credit...Sandy Huffaker for The New York Times

Mr. Biden will pick up an endorsement on Wednesday from UnidosUS, the largest Latino nonprofit advocacy organization in the country, and address the group during its annual conference.

It is the second time the political arm of the national organization has backed a presidential candidate, after endorsing Hillary Clinton in 2016, and another indication of how focused national Latino groups are on defeating Mr. Trump. Several other national Latino organizations that have typically stayed out of partisan politics are considering officially backing Mr. Biden this year.

“Joe Biden will work for us, not against us,” Janet Murguía, the president of UnidosUS Action Fund, said in a statement. “He will work tirelessly to unite us and to heal our nation. And he will do this because he shares our values of faith, family, hard work, and a belief in the promise of America not just for some, but for all of us.”

The endorsement comes as some Democrats have worried about enthusiasm among Latino voters for Mr. Biden’s candidacy, and that the Biden campaign is not doing enough to reach out to Latinos, who are projected to be the largest nonwhite voting bloc this year. While polls have consistently shown that Mr. Trump is deeply unpopular with the vast majority of Hispanic voters, he has held on to the support of roughly 25 percent of them.

Julie Chávez Rodriguez, a senior adviser for the Biden campaign, said that Latinos were a “huge part of the pathway to victory” in battleground states including Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona and Texas. “In places like Michigan where Hilary lost by these very narrow margins, Latinos can make up that difference,” she said.

Unidos will work with local organizations in Florida, Texas, Arizona and Pennsylvania to increase voter turnout and register new voters, officials said.

Credit...Orlin Wagner/Associated Press

With a close Republican Senate primary election in Kansas one week away, the top spender isn’t either of the two leading contenders; it is a Democratic-allied super PAC trying to push voters toward the more polarizing candidate, Kris Kobach.

The group, Sunflower State, is spending $2.4 million to boost Mr. Kobach on TV and radio in the final days of the primary cycle, far more than the approximately $1 million being spent in support of his chief rival, Representative Roger Marshall, according to Advertising Analytics.

Mr. Kobach, a former Kansas Secretary of State known for hard-line positions on immigration, lost the race for governor in 2018. Republican leaders in Washington, who back Mr. Marshall, are worried that nominating Mr. Kobach would put the open seat in play. Kansas hasn’t sent a Democratic senator to Washington in 88 years.

A super PAC tied to Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, is running ads supporting Mr. Marshall. A second outside group tied to Mr. McConnell, Plains PAC, is more aggressive, warning Republicans not to choose Mr. Kobach because he lost the governor’s race to Laura Kelly, a Democrat, and has ties to white nationalists.

The winner of the 11-person Republican primary will most likely face State Senator Barbara Bollier, a Democrat who has raised an impressive sum of money.

Meddling by one party in another party’s primary is nothing new. The treasurer of Sunflower State, which was created this month, has worked for a former Kansas Democratic governor. An email sent to the address it provided on a recent filing was not returned. A spokeswoman for the Senate Majority PAC, which supports Democrats across the country, declined to comment when asked if it was funding Sunflower State.

One person who is still publicly on the sidelines and likely to remain there: Mr. Trump. In 2018 he campaigned for Mr. Kobach. But to endorse him now would infuriate Mr. McConnell. So Mr. Trump is reportedly working behind the scenes for Mr. Marshall, but to openly offer his blessing would anger the most conservative voters in the president’s base.

At this time in 2016, Representative Ami Bera of California was the only Indian-American in Congress. That November, four more were elected to join him.

Now, one of those four — Senator Kamala Harris of California — is a leading contender to be former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s running mate, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is running an ad in Hindi, and an advocacy group for Indian-American candidates is announcing that it will spend $10 million in this year’s elections.

That group, Impact, will announce its plans on Tuesday along with a new executive director, the public interest lawyer Neil Makhija, who called 2020 a “pivotal moment” for Indian-Americans.

Indian-Americans are the second largest immigrant group in the United States, after Mexicans, but they account for only five members of Congress: Ms. Harris, Mr. Bera and Representatives Pramila Jayapal of Washington, Ro Khanna of California and Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois, all Democrats. Impact’s investment is an effort to increase that number, and also to elect Indian-American candidates to offices as far down-ballot as local school boards.

Mr. Makhija said in an interview Tuesday that the group’s efforts would be focused on recruiting, training and supporting candidates, and though it is not explicitly aligned with Democrats the group’s “values certainly lean that way.”

According to the research firm CRW Strategy, more than three-quarters of Indian-American voters supported Hillary Clinton in 2016, and Mr. Makhija said they were also likely to support Mr. Biden.

Reporting was contributed by Davey Alba, Maggie Astor, Alexander Burns, Emily Cochrane, Nick CorasanitiNicholas Fandos, Jacey Fortin, Trip Gabriel, Katie Glueck, Shane Goldmacher, Annie Karni, Thomas Kaplan, Patricia Mazzei, Katie Rogers, Rick Rojas, Charlie Savage, Lynn Vavreck, Christopher Warshaw and Michael Wines.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"fuel" - Google News
July 29, 2020 at 08:28AM
https://ift.tt/30SNFmS

Biden Addresses Racial Justice, Saying Trump Adds ‘Fuel to the Fire’ - The New York Times
"fuel" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2WjmVcZ


Bagikan Berita Ini

0 Response to "Biden Addresses Racial Justice, Saying Trump Adds ‘Fuel to the Fire’ - The New York Times"

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.